- Perspectives
Working with Beta Readers and Editors
We’re continuing our series on collaboration, from start to finish—in part three, we’re shining the spotlight to the dynamic duo who (somehow) make sense of our messy drafts: beta readers and editors!
We’ll dig into the most common challenges writers face during early and late-stage revisions, share insights from writers, betas, and editors in the community, and consider ways to navigate the process with confidence and clarity.
The next step... feedback
Earlier in our series, we explored the joys, potential pitfalls, and (occasional) dramas of collaboration—and how to build deep creative partnerships for telling more dynamic stories. But even if you write solo, there’s a pretty big collaborative step that many (if not most!) writers take to get their work ready for the wider world.
When a writer feels their draft is almost there (or just teetering on the edge of chaos), the next step isn’t revising in isolation—it’s cracking open the metaphorical locked door and inviting someone else into their creative space. That first act of sharing can feel a little terrifying—opening up your carefully guarded story to opinions… and yes, judgment.
But your first reader is less a judge, and more like a story’s (or writer’s) therapist: their role isn’t to rewrite your work, but to reflect and help you navigate unnoticed plotholes, and guide you through the parts of your story you’ve been carefully sidestepping (or outright avoiding). They’re not there to solve all your problems, but they’ll ask the right questions and nudge you toward the answers—especially ones you never knew you needed.
Late-stage revision is also where writers face some of their biggest fears (criticism!), hurdles (deadlines!), and technical challenges (disorganized feedback!). It’s messy, vulnerable work, but it’s also where stories can evolve to become their best versions.
So—let’s explore beta reading and editing, and how to manage those late-stage revisions smoothly, effectively (and maybe even joyfully).
Beta readers: a story’s first testers
Beta readers are the unsung heroes of early-stage storytelling. Unlike editors, whose focus is technical, end-stage polish, beta readers engage with the heart of the story—considering plot, pacing, structure, characters, etc.—offering honest, instinctive feedback before the final polish. That’s where beta reading shines—because collaboration at this stage can make a story. It helps to think of a beta as your story’s first audience: familiar with the text and its objectives, they’ll spot what works, what confuses, and what needs a lot more iteration before the draft is pushed out into the wider world.
In our collaborative writing survey, 62.4% of respondents shared that they’ve worked with beta readers or editors, while another 22.8% were curious but hadn’t taken the leap yet. It makes sense—handing your work to a reader for feedback is a vulnerable act, and the fear of hearing “it’s not good enough” is real. Unsurprisingly, 42.4% of writers listed fear of criticism as one of the hardest parts of collaborating with betas and editors—right up there with sticking to deadlines (42.7%).
But the truth is that beta reading and editing aren’t about judgment; they’re relationships built on insight. A great beta doesn’t tear down a story; they help build it up, pointing out where it shines and where it stumbles.
I think one of the biggest fears of collaborative writing is seeing the beta-reader(s) disassembling your work, something you have poured your heart in and something that is so, so dear to you. But I think that jumping into the cold water could benefit you or other writers very well. Yes, it can be scary, and you will feel like your writing is not good enough the first time your beta will criticize something else. But know that they, authors and editors alike, will always have your interests at heart too. They want to see the story succeed.
Writers engage beta readers at different stages, for different reasons (and different points of view). Some want big-picture feedback: Does the plot flow naturally? Are the characters relatable? Where does the pacing drag? Others seek fresh eyes or an outsider’s perspective, because knowing your story too well can make it hard to accurately see its flaws. A reader familiar with the tropes and expectations of your audience will make sure you hit the right beats while avoiding clichés or overwhelming the plot with info dumps—while a reader unfamiliar with the genre or fandom might have a totally different view. Some writers prefer blind betas who read without context, mirroring an actual audience; others share detailed background notes to guide feedback.
There’s no wrong way to beta—just a willingness to listen and experiment.
Building a better beta relationship
Even though a beta reading relationship doesn’t have the same day-to-day entanglement as co-authoring, it can be just as deep, meaningful, and challenging to navigate. In our survey, 93.1% of respondents prioritized honest, constructive feedback, with good communication (74.1%) and attention to detail (74.1%) close behind.
Discuss things regularly and keep in contact with each other. It's easy to lose momentum or interest when you don't think about the stuff you're working on, and good communication is always a plus. Don't be afraid to share, whether its ideas, comments or criticism.
They also highlighted some of the biggest hurdles that come with beta reading—with sticking to deadlines topping the list at 42.7% (Whomst among us hasn’t over-promised on timing?), while fear of criticism followed at 42.4% (more on that later). Managing creative differences cropped up for 41%, and organizing feedback (without losing your mind) was a challenge for 33.5%. Finally, 32.2% wrestled with switching between tools and chaotic workflows, which can be make-or-break for communication and draft management.
Communicate, communicate, communicate. Talk to the people you're working with about anything and everything that might affect either of your workflows. Whether it's an emotional reaction to a bit of criticism or an intentional "mistake" that the other(s) are trying to fix for you, tell your collaborators.
As in all relationships, it’s important to set expectations. Being upfront, and letting your betas know what kind of feedback you need—big-picture impressions, character arcs, pacing issues, etc.—is key for framing feedback as a dialogue, not judgment. Some writers like to engage multiple betas for diverse points of view—but that means multiple opinions, which can get overwhelming fast. Streamlining the process by organizing feedback—via clearly-labeled drafts, color-coding for themes like pacing, character development, and plot—can help you spot patterns and areas for improvement without getting lost in the sauce.
And (say it with us!) communication is the foundation for a smooth beta. Choosing the right tools to support shared commenting, spur of the moment chats, and structured feedback sessions can keep things moving smoothly, so you can focus on refining your story without wrangling messy tools and workflows. When the tech supports the process (and the writer’s psyche), collaborating becomes effortless— that’s where the magic happens.
Working with editors
First drafts are the dirt you build a house on, and dirt is kind of ugly, so don't get hung up on perfection. Give yourself a chance to enjoy the editing process.
Editors are the final step (or final boss) of the collaboration process, helping writers bridge the gap between “good” and “ready for the discerning eyes of the public” (or, yikes, the internet), doing the meticulous work of transforming a rough(ish) draft into a polished, refined story.
Back in the day, writers and editors formed long-term partnerships, with professional editors often editing a single writer over the course of their entire career. While the ways we write and publish have changed a lot since then, editors still play a major role in storytelling—they take the baton from beta readers, focusing on the text’s form and function to get it across the finish line.
Editors come in all shapes and specialties, and finding the right one depends on where you are in the writing process. Editing can sometimes overlap with beta reading, especially in gift economy communities where the process is generally more informal (and unpaid). In writing groups and fandom spaces, you might find fellow writers willing to trade editing services, while in online marketplaces, you'll find a range of professional editors who charge for their work, with fees depending on the type of editing, the length of the work, and the editor’s experience.
The type of editor you need depends on what needs editing: A developmental editor focuses on the big picture—helping you tighten up structure, plot, pacing, and themes so the story lands right. A line editor will take a closer look at the sentence level, refining style, tone, and clarity. And when it’s time to clean up technical details, a copy editor will handle grammar, punctuation, and consistency, while a proofreader comes in last to catch pesky typos and minor errors that slip through the cracks. A sensitivity reader can bring informed feedback and personal experience to make sure that cultural representation and identity are handled with accuracy and respect.
Finding the *right* editor
In our survey, writers were clear on how much they value first readers who provide honest, constructive feedback (93.1%). Here, constructive is key—it’s not about being tough on your work, but being thoughtful, direct, and invested results in an ideal editing experience. Another 69% (nice) stressed the importance of editors who understand their genre or audience—like betas, an editor native to your space will know what resonates with readers and what doesn’t. A line editor might not need encyclopedic knowledge of the deepest lore in a particular fandom, but understanding why a particular snippet of backstory was included can make a huge difference for readers.
But most importantly—a good editor respects your voice, and helps you refine your work at a late stage without overriding your vision. The very best editors elevate your work while still ensuring it feels yours.
Be receptive to other people's opinions and suggestions, but unless you're actually co-authoring a work, do remember that it's your creation and, ultimately, what you write is up to you. Otherwise, the criticism quickly becomes oppressive rather than constructive, and, in an effort to comply with it, you might take your story in a direction you never wanted. Take good advice, but don't let it pressure you.
The best way to find an editor that gels with you is to start by asking the right questions. What kind of editing do you actually need—big-picture developmental work or line-level polishing? Do they have experience with your target audience? How do they approach edits—and what’s their timeline? And most importantly: do they get your voice?
Facing the fear of feedback
Constructive criticism isn't "this is bad," its "I think this would work better if..."
As writers, we’ve all been there—receiving feedback can stir up a hot mess of emotions, from defensiveness to self-doubt—and it’s totally normal to feel protective of the work you’ve poured your time and energy into. But betas and editors aren’t there to overwrite your work—just like you, they want to enhance it. It’s important to remember that feedback, given constructively, isn’t personal; it’s about helping your story grow.
Don't be afraid to not listen to every bit of good criticism. Don't immediately throw it out either. Just keep it in mind.
When a suggestion doesn’t sit right, resist the urge to immediately dismiss it. Instead, pause and ask yourself what the feedback is trying to solve. A question like, “How can we address this pacing issue while keeping my tone intact?” can transform critique into deeper understanding—or a breakthrough moment. Sometimes, it’s not the suggestion itself but the underlying issue that matters most. Trust that your collaborators want your story to succeed… and trust yourself to choose the feedback that speaks to you, and truly serves your story.
Be open to their ideas. You can not want to do them, but be open minded and think about how their ideas could work in the piece of writing. It might change your mind and make your writing a lot better. Or it might not suit it. Don't be stubborn and try force them to only use your ideas, for then it truly takes away the collaboration element.
Integrating feedback and edits can feel overwhelming when you’re faced with conflicting opinions or a mountain of notes. One way to avoid decision paralysis is to track patterns in the feedback. If multiple readers highlight the same weak characterization in Chapter 5, it’s a sign that area needs tweaking. Tracking feedback by themes (e.g., plotholes, inconsistencies, pacing) can make it easier to stay organized as you collect, analyze, and incorporate feedback.
It’s also incredibly important to give yourself the space to process. Taking breaks between revisions can help you gain perspective, so stash that story in a drawer (or a folder) to consider your feedback more objectively. But always trust your instincts—you know your story better than anyone else. Not every suggestion will align with how you want to tell it, and that’s totally fine—keep the feedback that resonates and let go of what doesn’t. Collaboration is about growth, not perfection (the enemy of good!).
Learning how to interpret criticism is an invaluable skill; being able to take in feedback from other authors, from beta readers, and from reviews to then channel into methods to improve your craft and better your writing will take you from "great" to "incredible." Learn how to find the core message from the most negative of feedback.
Editing together, writing stronger
Whether you’re sharing your first draft with a beta or handing your final manuscript off to an editor for polishing, collaborative editing will help your story reach its full potential. It’s not always easy—criticism, deadlines, and feedback management are very real challenges—but when managed, the rewards are more meaningful stories than could be achieved alone—just a little vulnerability required.
You only grow to the degree that you make space for growth.
Tips—
Embrace critique: Stay open to feedback—but stay true to your story.
Choose betas wisely: Pick readers who know your genre—but include a few wildcards for fresh ideas!
Clarify your needs: Tell editors what you’re looking for—big-picture feedback or line edits?
Edit in layers: Dig into structure first, then polish the details.
Keep it conversational: Feedback is a dialogue—ask follow-ups and dig deeper.
Take a step back: Take a short break before your final edits for a new perspective.
Next up...
Why writing communities are so important (and might be changing how stories are told!).
And on that note… why not check out our Discord!